Stephanie Hook
B. Gleason
Theories and Models of Literacy
11/12/13
Research
Paper Proposal: Concept Imagery for the Classroom
Sources:
1.) Bell,
“Imagery and the Language Processing Spectrum”
2.) Lindamood,
“The Roles of Concept Imagery, Phoneme Awareness, and Symbol Imagery in
Cognitive Modifiability”
3.) Carruthers,
“Language in Cognition”
4.) Enns,
The Thinking Eye, The Seeing Brain: Explorations in Visual Cognition
5.) Piaget,
“Cognitive Precursors to Language”
6.) Gardner,
Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand
7.) Hirsch,
“Cultural Literacy”
Questions:
What is Concept Imagery?
Who developed the Concept Imagery
methodology?
What research has been done?
What type of student typically
receives this kind of instruction?
How can concept imagery be utilized
in mainstream classrooms to help cultivate more connective comprehension in
students?
What educational standards
necessitate greater focus on alternate modes of teaching conceptual material?
Topic:
An individual’s foundational
and ever expanding cultural knowledge is supportive (some would even argue,
essential) to the development of strong literacy skills. This foundational knowledge and the strong
literacy skills that correspond to it are intrinsic to an individual’s strong
performance in academics settings.
However, students often struggle to retain information presented to them
in the classroom and are resistant to the rote memorization methodology
employed ad nauseam in mainstream schools. Focusing on concept imagery,
however, can make school easier for most students. Teaching in a way that
stimulates students’ concept imagery is highly effective for both teachers and
students.
By using imagistic
language and visual components while presenting lessons in science and the
humanities, educators can help students build a visually-based schema of
information and ideas that they will retain longer and utilize more critically
than lessons they have simply memorized.
Without this type of cognitive development, students often have trouble
reading for understanding: they read and then re-read over and over, they
forget important facts, have trouble identifying relationships and contrasts
between concepts and have trouble thinking critically about the information.
They simply recall the information as it was transmitted to them, as rote
facts. Their foundation in cultural, historical and scientific literacy will
remain shaky as long as educators rely solely on the idea that education is transmission
and reception based, and not understanding based. Instruction focused on concept
imagery helps foster an education based on understanding. When someone sees
something, they can understand it more deeply.
Why:
There are many
learning differences represented in the average American classroom. So much so that expecting all student
to receive and retain every imperative lesson on culture, history and
literature is not only unrealistic, it is impossible. Concept Imagery on the other hand is a concrete way in which
all students can engage visually (albeit at different levels of proficiency)
with their school texts and lessons.
Creating visual representations of important historic and cultural facts
helps to build imagistic scaffolding upon which each student can build upon and
draw from without knowing but simply by picturing. This mental schema is imperative for students to comprehend
challenging, abstract concepts, for example, the span of time. When educators focus on fostering a mental
time-line visually within each of their students, pupils can then utilize that
imagery for factual recall and critical reflections on subjects such as
history, global studies and cultural development.
Conceptual
and cultural background knowledge is imperative for students to build upon in
order to develop complex understanding and to be able to critically process new
information. However mainstream
classrooms often utilize a rote memorization strategy in order for students to
receive and add to this foundational knowledge. Applying concept imagery techniques in the classroom helps
students to build an enduring schema of cultural, historical and political
imagery that students retain, add–to and draw–from throughout their academic,
and social experiences.
Challenges:
A primary
challenge of this paper will be highlighting the focus of my discussion to the
uses of concept imagery in a mainstream classroom. It has already been
demonstrated as highly useful in Special Education classrooms and remediation
settings, however I would like to argue that cultivating strong concept imagery
in every student, no matter their ability level, is highly beneficial and a
valuable pursuit for educators. Also, it will be an interesting challenge to find resources
and research documentation beyond those of Nanci Bell and Phyllis Lindamood –
who are my primary sources at this point.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.